Journey mapping is a powerful tool — if you map the real journey. These four mistakes reduce it to a pretty exercise with no effect.
Journey mapping is among the most useful service improvement tools and among the most misused. The difference between a map that produces improvement and one that ends up on a wall usually comes down to four mistakes.
1. Mapping the journey from inside the room
An internal team gathers and maps what it believes the customer goes through. The result is a map of the internal process, not the journey. A valid map is built from interviews, field observation and complaint data — not from memory.
2. Starting at first contact and ending at service delivery
The journey begins much earlier: realising the need, finding the right entity, understanding the requirements. And it ends much later: follow-up, renewal, complaints. Most of the real pain sits outside the span teams typically map.
3. A map with no numbers
A map that describes emotions but carries no stage duration, drop-off rate or complaint count cannot support prioritisation. Attach at least one number to each stage and the priority becomes obvious.
4. No link to an owned improvement plan
The map is not the deliverable. The deliverable is a list of improvement initiatives ranked by impact and effort, each with an owner, a date and an indicator that measures success. Without that list, the workshop was a social activity.
Start with a free diagnostic session
Tell us where you stand and what you want to achieve, and we will come back with an initial view of scope, duration and investment within two working days.